What Is The Correct Role Of Government In A Free Country? Part 1

10 Oct

Image by Loulair Harton via Flickr

It seems that one of the basic questions facing us today is
the same one that Americans have been arguing since the nation’s inception.
That question is:

What is the correct role of government? How much is too much? When is enough; enough?

In discussing this we need to revisit the state of man in nature
where he is the only authority and then decide what decisions we want to
relinquish if any.

British physician and political philosopher John Locke state
this condition of man as follows:

“a state of perfect freedom of

acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as they think fit

within the bounds of the law of nature. People in this state do not have to ask

permission to act or depend on the will of others to arrange matters on their

behalf. The natural state is also one of equality in which all power and

jurisdiction is reciprocal and no one has more than another. It is evident that

all human beings – as creatures belonging to the same species and rank and born

indiscriminately with all the same natural advantages and faculties – are equal

amongst themselves.”

So now here we are in a state of perfect freedom but we find
that it would benefit us to associate with other who are in the same state of

At first one or two from time to time. And we find that on
those occasions where we join with these others and tent together we are far better
able to defend our property from predators animal or human.

Now generally, in small numbers, like two or perhaps three,
we all get on fine. I do my thing, they do theirs and we all agree to keep our
personal habits and ways out of the public area between the tents.

At some point as this group grows, someone will see that I
like to chew betel nut. They don’t like betel and find the sight of my stained
teeth offensive.

Now comes the problem. Rather than turning away or refusing
to look at me or staying home or walking another way or just getting a flaming
grip, they decide to lobby the group and convince them that betel nut should be
banned. Not just in the public areas but in all private residences as well.
Perhaps it is written in the scrolls of the Forest Spirit, “Youse guys bettah
not chew dat freakin’ Betal nut” and they will site this as proof of their
righteous purpose. Perhaps the local barber who also does dentistry says, “Chewin’
that betel is frightful bad for the teeth” and they will site this as reason
for a prohibition on Betel as a dangerous substance.

Now if the community would have said STOP! Just after the
suggestion that they had a right to decide what a person does in the private
areas, the community could go on as before making whatever rules it wishes for
its public areas by a majority vote of the citizens. But when that person or
community attempts to dictate my behavior on my own property it has gone beyond
its authority under the law of nature as stated above. Only with my consent can
they dictate my behavior and I don’t give it. By word or inference. I will not
relinquish my rights or my right to make decisions for myself where they don’t
conflict with others rights.

There is no good reason other than one persons desire for
power over another that people can’t live together and yet practice different
religions, dietary habits, personal habits (such as chewing Betel nut), and
other personal choices.

As time goes on you realize that when you get a few decades
older, you may not be able to defend your property as well as you once did and
your flocks are harder to care for than they once were. As everyone else is in
the same boat they all decide to set up an agency to distribute food and lend a
hand where needed or even to just take over your care if necessary. You will
pay in now and when you get old it will come back in the form of whatever you
need. Simple right? You designate a person or group of people to administer the
system and away you go. You have just created Social Security (albeit a really
good S.S. System).

The problems arise when those folks you appointed to
administer your new system begin to cause the system to evolve and change so
that they begin to compare the value of your cabbages to the value of my corn
or the value of one persons home compared to that of another person’s home and
use the inverse tangent of the triangle formed by the convergence of the three
rivers in conjunction with the amount of free time you have on an average Saturday
in June to estimate the amount of help due you.

Now they no longer operate the system for your benefit. And
only they know the intricacies of the system.

Now they say, “Since we control the system we have decided
that to be a part of the system, you must not be a betel nut chewer. If you
chew, you forfeit all claims to help and lose all that you have contributed.
Again, the desire for power over other people.

Or you may find as your community grows that in addition to
Social Security, you need water and sewer systems and someone to manage them.
Then electric service and telephone and someone to manage those and before you
know you have created a bureaucracy. And now the rules and restrictions begin
to flow from the mouth of the system like water from a pitcher.  And through complexity you have unwittingly
surrendered your rights or perhaps wittingly. Lies may come into play, “we need
to dictate public policy in order to assure continued service etc.

In the end you have lost all say in your life in order to
gain the benefits of society.

But society need not be such a burdensome thing if we just
remember to say STOP!!! When our rights are in danger. This country has gone on
far too long with these personal decisions being dictated by one power group or
another. Making arbitrary laws or laws designed to protect the interests of a
few. Prohibition is a prime example of just such a law. I don’t have to look at
the history books to know that Prohibition was not supported by a majority of
Americans. Yet it not only became law but was ratified as an amendment to the

This whole thing is beyond ridiculous. The idea that any
government should have the authority to tell me what I can and can’t drink or
smoke or wear in my own home in order for me to live in the community is in
direct conflict with the nature of man and the rights of man.

For them to dictate to me what I can possess anywhere
is the same. So to say you can’t chew Betel in the town square is ok if that is
the wish of a majority of citizens but not to say you can’t have it in your
pocket. And what you have or chew in your own home or on your own property is
never within their purview.

The idea that one must conform in all ways to the desires of
any community in order to reap the benefits of association with that community
is a recipe for conflict and civil unrest. Someone will always be unhappy with
the restrictions.

The natural response would be to say that if you don’t like
the rules of the community, move. But in the world we live in, it is nearly
impossible to find a place where someone isn’t dictating the rules that you
must follow and inflicting cruel and extreme punishments on those who refuse to
conform. They don’t say, “Get out you Betel Chewer”. They make possession of Betel
Nut illegal and force you to stay. Under arrest.

The people who are in power all over the world are not
satisfied to control our behavior in the town square. They are not satisfied to
control our behavior in our homes. The people in power all over the world want
to control our behavior no matter where we go. Or lock us up to prevent us
escaping to a place where we can control our own behavior.

Of course most people are not prepared to move into a Yurt
in the wilderness to secure these freedoms.

And again, why should they have to? We say we want a free country.
We are even so deluded as to say that we have a free country. But we will never
be free until we tell the government we demand our rights. Until we set a clear
standard of uncompromising focus that stops these restrictions to freedom and
forces the government to work for the people in truth as well as in rhetoric.

My need for a sewer system or electricity does not translate
to a willingness to give up my rights and freedom to do as I please as long as
I don’t stop another from doing as they please also.

My need for the protection of the community does not
translate to a willingness to give up my Betel Nut or a willingness to allow
them to imprison me for having one in my home, or growing it in my garden, or
chewing it with my morning coffee.

Freedom in a large community requires tolerance and the
ability to mind your own business. It’s those who would seek the power to
control who are the least worthy of such power. Those who know what’s good for
others that are bad for everyone.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 responses to “What Is The Correct Role Of Government In A Free Country? Part 1

  1. ♡ The Tale Of My Heart ♡

    December 16, 2011 at 18:15

    This always remain a question ? when we have corrupt leaders in power 🙂

    • angrymanspeaks

      December 16, 2011 at 18:57

      yes it does. If they were not corrupt; we could find some harmony with them and their role would be easy to agree upon and would be based truly on the needs of the society. So sad.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


Some political ramblings...and other jumbledness

From Where I Sit

Thoughts from an old Southern guy

The Blog

The latest news on and the WordPress community.

The Undaunted Democrat

Politics Taken seriously

Paul Militaru

Photography Portfolio

The Fifth Column

"News and views from around the world"

Annals of Immaturity

Tales of My Confusion Regarding What it Means to be an Adult

Liberated Way

Action in harmony with nature

Zeebra Designs & Destinations

An Artist's Eyes Never Rest


Issues of politics, race, and everything else.

"Do or Do not. There is no try."

A Little Tour in Yellow

A Premise Salesman with Some Things on His Mind

List of X

This Blog Is Not Recommended By WordPress

History Of The Ancient World

Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell,and you can foresee the future too -Marcus Aurelius-

World Of Alexander The Great

"Everything is possible to him who will try"

Ask Old Jules

the Hermit in the Hill Country


"in nonsense is strength"

The Sieve of Truth

Sieving the credible from the incredible

As My World Turns

What's New and Has My Attention

Bell Book Candle

Politics and poetry

♥ The Tale Of My Heart ♥

In your light, I learn how to love. In your beauty, how to make poems. You dance inside my chest, where no one sees you.

So Far From Heaven

Too many reincarnations in a single lifetime to trust this one.

Dogpaddling Through Life

Accompanied by Cats With Big Attitudes

%d bloggers like this: